DaVinci IQ3 Vs AirVape ENSO

Although vaping has grown in popularity, there are significant health hazards involved. A lot of people use gadgets like the AirVape Ensō and the DaVinci IQ3 because they believe they are better options. Despite their many sophisticated features but these gadgets are far from flawless. Based on actual user reviews this article compares these two gadgets. Their shortcomings and the risks of vaping are highlighted. 

DaVinci IQ3 Vs AirVape ENSO

Design & Build Quality

The DaVinci IQ3 is constructed from brushed aluminium of aircraft quality. The gadget seems sturdy and high-end as a result. Users say however that it weighs more than they anticipated. Because of its weight it is more difficult to carry around. A zirconia-glass mouthpiece that is part of the device is said to retain flavour. But after lengthy sessions, a lot of consumers find it uncomfortable. The device’s size is yet another disadvantage. Other vaporisers are more discreet than this one. All things considered the design seems heavy and unwieldy for those seeking a portable item. 

The AirVape Ensō is designed differently. Its glass water tank and zinc alloy body are features. It weighs more than five pounds and is a huge instrument.  Many consumers say that its bulk makes it hard to carry about. Users find the device’s magnetic mouthpiece to be convenient. Leaks have happened to many people and the mouthpiece is not always secure. One of the biggest issues for consumers who want a portable tablet is its size. The size renders it unsuitable for daily usage despite its fashionable appearance.

Performance & Vapor Quality

According to the manufacturer, the DaVinci IQ3 will heat up in roughly 30 seconds. But according to a lot of people, it takes a lot longer. According to others, it can take up to a minute to get the temperature just perfect. The AirVape Ensō has trouble heating up as well. Before it reaches the desired temperature some users claim that it takes several minutes.

The gadgets are annoying for people who want to vape quickly because of this delay.chill CoreTM technology is used by the IQ3 to chill the vapour. Although many users find the vapour harsh and unpleasant but this is designed to increase flavour. The vapour has a patchy fleeting flavour throughout. The porcelain chamber and water tank of the AirVape Ensō also promise a smooth experience. 

However consumers complain that the flavour and vapour quality are poor. The vapour may feel faint and diluted due to the water tank. The vaping experience is not satisfactory with any device. With 1-degree temperature adjustments, the DaVinci IQ3 provides accurate temperature control. Users however find the controls difficult to understand.

The Smart PathTM settings on the device are not always precise. Many customers complain that it is hard to change the temperature. Which lowers the quality of the vapour. The temperature range of the AirVape Ensō is 180°C to 330°C. Users however report that the temperature is inconsistent and varies. Neither device produces a consistent vaping experience.

Battery Life & Charging

There is a detachable 21700 lithium-ion battery in the DaVinci IQ3. The battery has an approximate 90-minute lifespan. But according to a lot of customers the battery drains considerably more quickly than anticipated. Some people discover that it barely lasts half an hour.

A 5000 mAh detachable battery is used with the AirVape Ensō. The stated duration is two hours. However a lot of users claim that it is not that long. According to several users the battery quickly runs out of power after a few sessions. As advertised neither device has a long-lasting battery.Charges the DaVinci IQ3 via Type-C. 

It requires roughly two hours to completely charge. Even longer, according to some users. The AirVape Ensō can take up to 3.5 hours to fully charge but it also employs Type-C charging. This long charging time makes the device inconvenient for users who need a fast recharge.

Both devices suffer from long charging times and unreliable battery life. Neither the DaVinci IQ3 nor the AirVape Ensō offer good battery life or quick charging. Both devices fall short in this area making them less practical for regular use. The long charging times and fast-draining batteries make both vaporizers unreliable.

Ease of Use & Maintenance

The DaVinci IQ3 features an LED grid display with vibration alerts. However many users find the interface confusing. The device has a steep learning curve and the controls are not intuitive. Some users complain that the app for controlling the device is difficult to navigate.

The AirVape Ensō has fewer controls but users still report problems. The temperature control is inconsistent and the magnetic mouthpiece is not always secure. Both devices offer poor user experiences and are not easy to use.The DaVinci IQ3 is difficult to clean. Users report that the mouthpiece and oven get clogged easily. The zirconia and glass parts require frequent cleaning to maintain performance. 

However users find these parts hard to clean thoroughly. The AirVape Ensō also has cleaning issues. The water tank and porcelain cups need regular cleaning. Some users mention that the device leaks water making cleaning even harder.

Both devices require a lot of maintenance to keep them working properly.Using the DaVinci IQ3 is frustrating. The cleaning process is time-consuming and the device is not easy to operate. The AirVape Ensō is just as inconvenient. The size and complexity of the device make it difficult to use. Both vaporizers require more time and effort than users expect.

Price & Value

The DaVinci IQ3 is priced at about 300 dollars. Many users feel that it is overpriced for the performance it offers. The vapor quality is inconsistent and the device is complicated to use. The AirVape Ensō costs even more at around 420 dollars. Given its poor vapor quality and large size many users feel that it is not worth the cost.

Both devices are expensive but fail to provide the value that users expect.The DaVinci IQ3 offers features like advanced temperature control and a larger oven. However these features do not work as well as advertised. The vapor quality is inconsistent and the device is difficult to use. The AirVape Ensō offers a unique water tank and porcelain chamber but these features do not improve the vapor quality.

Users feel that both devices are overpriced and do not deliver the performance they promise. Both the DaVinci IQ3 and the AirVape Ensō are flawed devices. They come with a high price tag but do not offer a satisfying vaping experience. Both suffer from poor vapor quality, long charging times and difficult maintenance. Neither is worth the money considering their drawbacks.

Pros & Cons Summary

DaVinci IQ3

Pros:

• Durable construction
• Advanced temperature control

Cons:

• Heavy and bulky
• Confusing interface
• Short battery life
• Difficult to clean
• AirVape Ensō

Pros:

• Unique water tank system
• Sleek design

Cons:

• Large and heavy
• Inconsistent temperature control
• Leaky water tank
• Poor vapor quality

Final Verdict: Which One is Better?

Both the AirVape Ensō and the DaVinci IQ3 have characteristics that seem desirable. However, there are significant problems with both devices. The Ensō is too large for daily use and the IQ3 is heavy and difficult to use. Both devices need a lot of maintenance and have uneven vapour quality. It is challenging to suggest either vaporiser because of these problems. There are significant health hazards associated with vaping itself. 

Long-term lung damage and respiratory issues might result from inhaling vapour. The risks associated with vaping cannot be eliminated by either of these devices. It is not safe to vape instead of smoke. Before choosing to use any vaping equipment users should be aware of the health dangers. This comparison demonstrates the serious shortcomings of both the IQ3 and the Ensō.